[GSoC] What would you like to see in IsItFedoraRuby.com?

[Wan Zuhao]

I see your point. 




On Sunday, April 15, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:

> On 2012-04-14 21:08, Wan Zuhao wrote:
> > Hi Jeroen,
> > 
> > What you've suggested is definitely a good idea. I do agree it's 
> > important
> > to reflect which *version*, in addtion to the name, link, etc. of a
> > particular gem that was converted into rpm, as sometimes the latest 
> > patches
> > and bug fixes are not included in the rpm.
> > 
> 
> 
> The point is also, sometimes bug fixes (especially security issues) 
> *are* in fact included in the RPM, but the gem/rpm package version 
> number would not reflect that.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Jeroen van Meeuwen
> 
> -- 
> Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG
> 
> e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com (http://kolabsys.com)
> m: +44 74 2516 3817
> w: http://www.kolabsys.com
> 
> pgp: 9342 BF08
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org (mailto:ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org)
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20120415/ebcb6f91/attachment.html>