gem2rpm and Ruby 1.9

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 7.2.2012 08:50, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 30.1.2012 15:14, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Dne 30.1.2012 14:57, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a):
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote, at 01/30/2012 05:19 PM +9:00:
>>>> Dne 30.1.2012 07:22, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> On Monday, January 23, 2012 05:31:32 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>>>> Dne 13.1.2012 02:59, Michael Stahnke napsal(a):
>>>>>>>> Has gem2rpm been updated for the Ruby 1.9 changes? The
>>>>>>>> guidelines
>>>>>>>> seem quite a bit different, an the gem2rpm macros in the current
>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>> (at least on EL6) don't map up. Things like
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> %gemdir rather than %gem_dir.
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have released gem2rpm 0.8.0 today (with great help of Bohuslav
>>>>>>> Kabrda), which supports new guidelines for Ruby 1.9.3 and Fedora
>>>>>>> 17. You
>>>>>>> can grab the gem from rubygems.org or get updated RPM version of
>>>>>>> gem
>>>>>>> from updates-testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please note that if you want to generate the .spec on some OS other
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> F17, you have to use "-t fedora-17-rawhide" parameter on your
>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>> line, which specifies the correct template. On F17, the F17
>>>>>>> template
>>>>>>> will be picked up automagically.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any feedback is welcomed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vit
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will 1.9.3 be pushed into rawhide soon? I'm starting to push new
>>>>>> rubygems into
>>>>>> rawhide but am afaid of conflicting 1.9.3. I'm still based off 1.8
>>>>>> for rawhide
>>>>>> doesn't have this landed yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>>> Hi Shawn,
>>>>> we have a special Koji target named f17-ruby, which will be merged 
>>>>> into rawhide just before branching to f17 (somewhere around 
>>>>> February 6). For instructions on how to work with that, please se 
>>>>> [1].
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shawn, yes, please build your package against (and only) the tag 
>>>> mentioned above.
>>>> You will save your/ours time with rebuild. Please make sure that 
>>>> all your dependencies
>>>> are built there [1] prior building you packages.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] 
>>>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?start=0&tagID=199&order=-build_id&inherited=0&latest=1
>>>
>>> Note that if you update (existing) package on f15(updates-testing),
>>> f16(updates-testing), and f17-ruby, and without f17, you will get
>>> "broken upgrade path" report from bodhi until f17-ruby packages get
>>> tagged into f17, because bodhi checks f15(updates-testing),
>>> f16(updates-testing), f17 but not f17-ruby. If you don't want to
>>> get this noisy report, you should once build a package against f17,
>>> bump release, and next build against f17-ruby.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mamoru
>>>
>>
>> You are right, I did not realized that. Thank you for pointing it 
>> out. However, since the f17-ruby will be merged into rawhide 
>> approximately in a week, I don't think the build for f17 is worth of 
>> the effort (unless somebody beets me to take some action ;).
>>
>>
>> Vit
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
> I have pushed the rubygem-gem2rpm into F15, F16. Enjoy.

I almost forgot to mention EPEL5 and EPEL6, which should land in a moment.

>
>
> Vit
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig