Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x

[Mo Morsi]

On 02/20/2012 04:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 13.2.2012 20:40, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
>> On 01/25/2012 04:46 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> It seems that we have almost eliminated usage of RSpec 1.x:
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 
>>> 'rubygem(rspec)'
>>> rubygem-ffi-0:1.0.9-2.fc16.src
>>> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.fc15.src
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)'
>>> aeolus-conductor-devel-0:0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 
>>> rubygem-rspec
>>> rubygem-daemon_controller-0:0.2.6-2.fc17.src
>>>
>>> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --arch=src --whatrequires rubygem-rspec
>>>
>>>
>>> The only remaining packages are:
>>> rubygem-ffi (bkearney) - seems to be just packaging bug: 
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760009
>>> rubygem-linode (stahnma) - upstream is already RSpec 2.x compatible, 
>>> it is FTBFS currently and it would deserve update anyway
>>> aeolus-conductor-devel (mmorsi, clalance, sseago) - Hm, are 
>>> rubygem(rspec-rails) 2.6 compatible with RSpec 1.x? I doubt it ...
>>> rubygem-daemon_controller (pwu) - It seems there should not be issue 
>>> running with RSpec 2.x, although I did not tested it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Could we move forward and let the rubygem-rspec to follow the 
>>> upstream RSpec version and Require: rubygem(rspec-core)?
>>>
>>
>>
>> +1, lets move forward with this. I'm in the process of updating the 
>> aeolus-conductor codebase to work against ruby 1.9.3 and will look 
>> into incorporating an update to rspec 2 into this.
>>
>> Since linode, ffi, and daemon_controller have been taken care of and 
>> we've long announced the update to rspec2 in F17, lets perform the 
>> final cutover. If there are issues going forward, we can easily 
>> introduce a rspec1 compat package.
>>
>>   -Mo
>>
>
> Mo,
>
> You mentioned in the packaging discussion that you have prepared 
> patches for rubygem-rspec to migrate them to RSpec 2.x, is that right? 
> Could you share them with us?
>
> Vit
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

Attached. All the packages which depend on rspec 1 have been taken care 
of except for rubygem-linode and aeolus-conductor (still in progress but 
should be finished soon).

Patch updates the package to ruby 1.9 and removes the majority of the 
contents, adding the dependencies on the rspec-{core|mock|expectations}, 
bringing it inline w/ the upstream gem.

   -Mo

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-update-to-rspec2-2.8.0-build-against-ruby-1.9.patch
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20120220/24839f75/attachment.ksh>