Updated Guidelines Draft

[Mo Morsi]

On 01/04/2012 11:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 4.1.2012 16:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
>> On 01/02/2012 08:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> thank you all for your comments. I updated the guidelines draft to reflect them:
>>
>> Again thanks for the new guidelines. Just a couple more comments 
>> inline below
>>
>>> - BR: ruby is now replaced with BR: ruby-devel for Ruby packages.
>>
>> Possible duplication / discrepancy:
>>
>> - In 'Ruby Packaging Guidelines':
>> "Ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at build time with a 
>> |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|, and *may* indicate the minimal ruby 
>> version they need for building."
>>
>> - In 'Build Architecture and File Placement':
>> "All non-gem ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at build 
>> time with a |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|. "
>>
>>
>> Which should it be, 'all' ruby packages or just 'non-gem' ruby 
>> packages. Most likely the former, so for simplicity sake, the latter 
>> should be removed.
>
> The latter is correct, since gems requires rubygems-devel and that 
> should be enough for gems.
>

Hrm? Don't see a rubygems-devel subpackage in the rubygems spec, is this 
going to be updated as well to incorporate that?



> However, reading the guidelines again, I am not happy with the 
> structure. We have RubyGems section, but we don't have Non-gems 
> section. The "Build Architecture and File Placement" should be 
> probably 3rd level and we need some nice 2nd level caption. Any idea?

Good idea, not sure as to the 2nd level though

   -Mo


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20120104/1a9b229c/attachment.html>