ruby-ldap

[Bohuslav Kabrda]

Yes, I believe that creating a new package is the right action to take. You should probably get into touch with the people that depend on ruby-ldap, first (repoquery shows that this should only be rubygem-activeldap).
Generally, we should try to package as many libraries as gems, because we want to share gems between different ruby implementations in the future (ruby/jruby/whatever).

Regards,
Bohuslav.

----- Original Message -----
> It looks like the upstream of ruby-ldap has moved to distribution as
> a
> gem only.  I can get a tarball from github based upon a tag, but that
> seems like a less good solution.
> 
> Does this mean that the package ruby-ldap should be retired, and a
> new
> package rubygem-ruby-ldap should be added?  This seems like quite a
> bit of work for nothing more than a distribution methodology change,
> but may be the best course.
> 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
> stahnma
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig