Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18

[Mo Morsi]

Sorry for the belated response. It seems like there are a few API
changes but nothing that we can't handle so no objections to updating
from here.

  -Mo

On 06/26/2012 01:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hey Mo,
> just googling around randomly, it seems that there are no problems with upgrade to Rails 3.2.
> I have already built 3.2.3 as an SCL [1] and run it with no problems whatsoever.
>
> Slavek.
>
> [1] https://fedorahosted.org/SoftwareCollections/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Have there been rails 3.2 rpms built? And what do Rails 3.0 -> 3.2
>> upgrade stories look like upstream? Might be worth considering
>> holding
>> this off for another Fedora release or two to let things shore up /
>> settle down.
>>
>>   -Mo
>>
>> On 06/21/2012 10:59 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
>>> Please do.... :)
>>>
>>> honestly im not using rails from fedora,  yes its old but we are
>>> seeing so many releases in such a short time thats challenging to
>>> keep
>>> up with 3.2.x , please jump directly to 3.2.6
>>>
>>> Guillermo
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
>>> <bkabrda at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18 [1] - I
>>>> figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting
>>>> quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be
>>>> glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before
>>>> submitting the feature to FESCo.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig