Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18

Bohuslav Kabrda bkabrda at redhat.com
Tue Jun 26 05:39:49 UTC 2012


Hey Mo,
just googling around randomly, it seems that there are no problems with upgrade to Rails 3.2.
I have already built 3.2.3 as an SCL [1] and run it with no problems whatsoever.

Slavek.

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/SoftwareCollections/

----- Original Message -----
> Have there been rails 3.2 rpms built? And what do Rails 3.0 -> 3.2
> upgrade stories look like upstream? Might be worth considering
> holding
> this off for another Fedora release or two to let things shore up /
> settle down.
> 
>   -Mo
> 
> On 06/21/2012 10:59 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
> > Please do.... :)
> >
> > honestly im not using rails from fedora,  yes its old but we are
> > seeing so many releases in such a short time thats challenging to
> > keep
> > up with 3.2.x , please jump directly to 3.2.6
> >
> > Guillermo
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> > <bkabrda at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18 [1] - I
> >> figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting
> >> quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be
> >> glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before
> >> submitting the feature to FESCo.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
> >>
> >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ruby-sig mailing list
> >> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

-- 
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.


More information about the ruby-sig mailing list