ruby-dbus status

[Michael Stahnke]

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'll create the rubygem-dbus and let you know when it reaches F17/F18, so that you can retire ruby-dbus.
> Is that ok?

Sure is
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Please help :)
>>
>> I just haven't been able to devote the time to many of these packages
>> since changing jobs.
>>
>> I am for help and co-maintainership 100% of the time.
>>
>>
>> stahnma
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Well, I am not maintainer of ruby-dbus, but if you want to update
>> > and use
>> > the gem, you will need new review of rubygem-dbus, which obsoletes
>> > ruby-dbus, anyway. I guess stahnma will not be against. I would
>> > also suggest
>> > to import it just for F18, or may be F17, but not for older
>> > Fedoras.
>> >
>> >
>> > Vit
>> >
>> > Dne 27.2.2012 02:18, Guillermo Gómez napsal(a):
>> >
>> >> Im working on a little ruby dbus project and i noticed our version
>> >> is
>> >> kind of old now.
>> >>
>> >> f16 repoquery info
>> >>
>> >> Name        : ruby-dbus
>> >> Version     : 0.3.0
>> >> Release     : 2.fc15
>> >> URL         : http://trac.luon.net/ruby-dbus/
>> >>
>> >> According that site the last version available is 0.7.0 and its
>> >> available as a gem from rubygems.org, can i help and comaintain?
>> >> (unleast i can try) Any reason to keep the actual version?
>> >>
>> >> cheers
>> >>
>> >> _- Guillermo -_
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig