Review swaps

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Tue Feb 26 08:38:38 UTC 2013


Dne 25.2.2013 19:34, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:39:39PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 25.2.2013 15:35, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a):
>>> I've got two Ruby gems up for package review, and would like to do a
>>> swap with someone (or two someones) to get them through:
>>>
>>>
>>> Review Request: rubygem-qpid_proton - Ruby language bindings for the Qpid Proton messaging framework
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906843
>>>
>>> Review Request: rubygem-rubeyond - A development framework for Ruby
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915331
>>>
>> Hi Darryl,
>>
>> Not that I am going to take the review, I just want to point out
>> that for F19, there was updated new packaging guidelines. It would
>> be cool if you can update the packages appropriately. Thank you.
> Hrm, I've modified the spec for rubygem-qpid_proton and it just fails
> on:
>
> %global rubyabi 1.9.1
>
> BuildRequires: ruby(release) >= %{rubyabi}
>
> with:
>
> mcpierce at mcpierce-laptop:rubygem-qpid_proton (master) $ rpmbuild -ba --rebuild rubygem-qpid_proton.spec
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> 	ruby(release) >= 1.9.1 is needed by rubygem-qpid_proton-0.3-1.1.fc18.x86_64
>
>

Yes, you need to use f19-ruby tag for build. However, the dependencies 
there might not be satisfied. So you can help with rebuild first ;) At 
least with your gems. That would definitely help.

Thank you.


BTW, the ruby(release) should be unversioned, unless there is special need.


Vít


More information about the ruby-sig mailing list