Policy re Gems that don't have RPMs yet?
Philip Rhoades
phil at pricom.com.au
Tue Feb 26 16:21:52 UTC 2013
People,
Thanks to the people who responded - see inline comments:
On 2013-02-26 21:14, Nathan Wan wrote:
> I'm no expert here but I'd like to add my two cents.
>
> http://isitfedoraruby.com [3] is a project started last summer. It is
> intended to give an overview of the progress of gem->rpm conversions
> on fedora.
Nice site!
> We used to have a section called Most Wanted Gems whose purpose is
> exactly to provide a way for people to vote for gems they want, but
> haven't been converted into rpms yet. Hopefully with more votes,
> developers will pay more attention to those highly wanted gems.
>
> (Well, at least this is what we've planned initially.)
That table is still there on the home page but how do I add to it?
> Although the website is still pretty much in progress, and
> unfortunately it only tracks gems with rpms currently (instead of the
> whole bunch from rubygems.org), maybe we will roll out the feature
> soon if people do find that useful.
I think it is a great idea for the whole Gem=>RPM project.
I don't have an immediate need for "devise" at the moment but I'm sure
I will have the need in a few months time - I will attempt the
conversion process (maybe on a simple gem first?) after I have moved
house in a month or so - but the process does look cumbersome - maybe it
is not as bad as it looks?
Regards,
Phil.
> Zuhao
>
> On Tuesday, 26 February, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Dne 25.2.2013 22:01, Philip Rhoades napsal(a):
>>
>>> People,
>>>
>>> A while ago I posted a note on the Devise forum asking if anyone was
>>> going to build an RPM for Fedora but didn't get any responses at all
>>> -
>>> no-one even viewed the post! What happens with Gems in this
>>> category? Am I supposed to do anything? Add a request somewhere?
>>
>> This will get probably the same attention as the post on Devise
>> forum.
>> Sorry.
>>
>>> Use the Gem instead of an RPM while I wait for someone to do the
>>> work
>>> for creating the RPM?
>>
>> This is definitely option.
>>
>> Should I bite the bullet and see how to produc
>>
>>> /blockquote>
>>>
>>> And this is the best possibility. You can
>> ] and I'll be
>> happy to sponsor you.
>>
>> Vít
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
>> [1]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ruby-sig mailing list
>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig [2]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
> [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
> [3] http://isitfedoraruby.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list
> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
--
Philip Rhoades
GPO Box 3411
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
E-mail: phil at pricom.com.au
More information about the ruby-sig
mailing list