Proper F18 & F19 spec notation

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 13.3.2013 15:32, Troy Dawson napsal(a):
> On 03/13/2013 09:25 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 13.3.2013 15:13, Troy Dawson napsal(a):
>>> Hi All,
>>> With the new F19 guidelines now in effect, I'm seeing I have lots of
>>> broken dependencies that want ruby(abi) and I'm in the middle of fixing
>>> them up.
>> If you need some priority help with some dependencies, please let me
>> know. You can find me (vondruch) in #fedora-ruby on freenode.
>>
>>> I can do something simple like.
>>>
>>> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
>>> BuildRequires: ruby(release) >= %{rubyabi}
>> You don't have to specify %{rubyabi} anymore, if you don't need to (e.g.
>> there is know that some library runs just on Ruby 2.0.0). The
>> "ruby(release)" virtual provide is versioned and should correspond to
>> MRI versions where in contrary, the %{rubyabi} corresponded to Ruby's
>> ABI (i.e. .so name).
>>
>>> %else
>>> BuildRequires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi}
>>> %endif
>>>
> OK, so unless a test proves my release needs a version, it would be
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
> Requires: ruby(release)
> BuildRequires: ruby(release)
> %else
> Requires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi}
> BuildRequires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi}
> %endif

Yes.
> I can handle that.

Ok, great :)


Vít