Process.daemon deadlock bug

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Mon Nov 25 08:45:21 UTC 2013


Dne 25.11.2013 03:15, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch at redhat.com>
>> To: ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:05:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
>>
>> Dne 22.11.2013 20:37, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch at redhat.com>
>>>> To: ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:43:32 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Process.daemon deadlock bug
>>>>
>>>> Dne 21.11.2013 00:08, Sam Kottler napsal(a):
>>>>> There is a pretty severe bug that's probably a good candidate for
>>>>> backport
>>>>> to F20 and rawhide. The patch [1] reduces a potential deadlock with using
>>>>> Process.daemon. I can commit the patch and build a new version for the
>>>>> affected versions, just want to make sure people are on-board with
>>>>> pushing
>>>>> this into our packages until 2.1 final is released.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sam
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/repository/revisions/41910/diff/process.c
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list
>>>>> ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>>>> Hi Sam,
>>>>
>>>> What is the original upstream issue? Is it backported to Ruby 2.0.0
>>>> already?
>>> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8616
>>>
>>> It is backported to 2.0 -
>>> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?revision=43142&view=revision.
>> Ok, thanks. Since new version of Ruby was released at Friday, they will
>> fix also this issue. Somebody should do rebase in all branches.
> Yeah, we need to bump the version to fix the latest CVE. Do you want to work on that or should I start on it?


Mamoru already started and I continue.


Vít


More information about the ruby-sig mailing list