Use rubygem(foo) or rubygem-foo

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Achilleas Pipinellis wrote, at 01/20/2014 07:37 AM +9:00:
> I know that both result to the same thing (if I remember correctly I had
> asked Vit about this in IRC), but I have forgotten their real difference.
>
> My attention got caught by a comment Josef made in one of his reviews
> [0], saying that rubygem-foo is the new syntax. If that's the case, I
> would like to propose 2 changes:
>
> a) A reference in the wiki
> b) An implementation for gem2rpm
>
> I guess b) could be fairly easy by changing the templates.
>
> By starting with these steps, there will be a push to use the new syntax
> from now on. What do you think?
>
> [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979749#c2
>

Please use syntax other interpreters do:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl?rd=Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP?rd=Packaging/PHP#Requires_and_Provides
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:OCaml?rd=Packaging/OCaml#Requires_and_provides

i.e. use rubygem(foo), not rubygem-foo.

Regards,
Mamoru