Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

[Josef Stribny]

I have just came across the Fedora Cloud SIG organization[0] on GitHub.
They also dropped the "sig", so fedora-ruby seems to be consistent with them.


[0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:55:47 AM
Subject: Re: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects

+1 

fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience. 

-Dan 


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny < jstribny at redhat.com > wrote: 


As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'. 

Josef 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" < axilleaspi at ymail.com > 
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" < ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org > 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM 
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects 

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own 
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is. 

Some already raised points: 

1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already 
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. 
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under 
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, 
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full 
ownership. 

2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their 
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights 
unfortunately but we'll figure it out. 

Projects that could share the namespace: 

1. gem2rpm [1] 
2. rubypick [2] 
3. pkgwat [3] 
4. gem-compare [4] 
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6] 

So, what do you think? 

-------- 

[0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 
[1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm 
[2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick 
[3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat 
[4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare 
[5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby 
[6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby 

-- 
FAS : axilleas 
GPG : 0xABF99BE5 
Blog: http://axilleas.me 
_______________________________________________ 
ruby-sig mailing list 
ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig 
_______________________________________________ 
ruby-sig mailing list 
ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig 



-- 
Dan Allen | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen 

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig