Provides in packages?

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Wed Jan 7 15:30:26 UTC 2015


Dne 7.1.2015 v 15:59 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Dne 7.1.2015 v 06:07 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
>>> To answer your question about why we just run "ruby -e
>>> this-long-and-complicated-copypasta" instead of "testrb", see
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-May/001585.html
>>> . The gems that use rspec do have a much shorter/saner %check section.
>> Ha, this reminds me that the guidelines should be updated finally. Any
>> volunteer? :)
> I didn't realize we hadn't updated the guidelines yet! :)
>
> Here you go: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/489

Magnificent! Thank you Ken.

BTW Mamoru, what is your plan with regards to rubygem-test-unit and
testrb2? Shouldn't we deprecate it as well? Does it even work currently?
There does not look to be %{gem_instdir}/bin in test-unit anymore and
with Ruby 2.2, the way how the testrb2 is created [1] will fail.


Vít


[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-test-unit.git/tree/rubygem-test-unit.spec#n76



More information about the ruby-sig mailing list