Provides in packages?

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Tue Jan 13 13:15:26 UTC 2015


Dne 13.1.2015 v 13:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/08/2015 12:30 AM:
>> Dne 7.1.2015 v 15:59 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Dne 7.1.2015 v 06:07 Ken Dreyer napsal(a):
>>>>> To answer your question about why we just run "ruby -e
>>>>> this-long-and-complicated-copypasta" instead of "testrb", see
>>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2014-May/001585.html
>>>>>
>>>>> . The gems that use rspec do have a much shorter/saner %check
>>>>> section.
>>>> Ha, this reminds me that the guidelines should be updated finally. Any
>>>> volunteer? :)
>>> I didn't realize we hadn't updated the guidelines yet! :)
>>>
>>> Here you go: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/489
>>
>> Magnificent! Thank you Ken.
>>
>> BTW Mamoru, what is your plan with regards to rubygem-test-unit and
>> testrb2? Shouldn't we deprecate it as well? Does it even work currently?
>> There does not look to be %{gem_instdir}/bin in test-unit anymore and
>> with Ruby 2.2, the way how the testrb2 is created [1] will fail.
>
> Well, this was very old craft, added 2 years ago (and the upstream
> rubygem-test-unit removed testrb 35 months ago). Now I removed this
> on F-22:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-test-unit.git/commit/?id=1187f8ae36ab318abef3f3b7effc05a23dfeea4f
>
>

Thanks.


Vít



More information about the ruby-sig mailing list