"gem unpack" support in RPM's %setup macro

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 10.11.2015 v 16:09 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com
> <mailto:vondruch at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi guys,
>
>     For a long time, I thought that it would be interesting to have .gem
>     expansion support in %setup macro. This would simply our .spec files a
>     bit. Finally, I gave a go to this idea and proposed this to RPM
>     upstream
>     [1]. Please let me know (preferably via the PR) if you can foresee any
>     issues with this approach.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>
>     Vít
>
>
>
>     [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/27
>     _______________________________________________
>     ruby-sig mailing list
>     ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>     <mailto:ruby-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org>
>     https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
>
>
> Hi Vit,
> I think this is a great idea.  Since the instructions for prep of
> rubygems have settled down for a couple years I think now is the time
> to do it.
>
> I do have one question.
> If I am reading the code right you have the equivalent of
> {gem unpack} SOURCE0 && gem spec SOURCE0 --ruby > {gem_name}.gemspec
>
> Why aren't you using the -l in the gem spec portion?
> Shouldn't it be
>
> {gem unpack} SOURCE0 && gem spec SOURCE0 -l --ruby > {gem_name}.gemspec
>
> Troy
>
>


Thank you, that is a good point. I omitted it just by accident. On the
other hand, what is the practical difference? Not sure. I should
probably dive a bit into RubyGems code.


Vít
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20151110/7040c1e5/attachment.html>