rpms/stripesnoop/devel stripesnoop-1.5-deflinux.patch, NONE, 1.1 stripesnoop-1.5-rpmoptflags.patch, NONE, 1.1 stripesnoop.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 13:30 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu,  4 Aug 2005 17:12:01 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> 
> > Author: spot
> > 
> > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/stripesnoop/devel
> 
> > %package devel
> > Summary:	Headers for stripesnoop
> > Requires:	%{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> > Group:		Development/System
> 
> > %files devel
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> > %{_includedir}/%{name}
> 
> What's the purpose of shipping C/C++ declarations without any library or
> object files to link against?

You're right. This is wrong. Force of habit. :)

Fixed in CVS.

Thanks,

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!