rpms/graphviz/devel graphviz.spec,1.14,1.15

[Owen Taylor]

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 16:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:31 -0400, John Ellson wrote:
> > >  
> > >
> > >>To be honest I'm feeeling some burnout and this is not the technical 
> > >>issue that I want to work on....
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >Pardon, but what's so complicated about adding a one line sed to an
> > >rpm.spec?
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > Its unlikely to be that simple.   As I understand it, ksh has 
> > capabilities not in bash.
> Which? I am not aware of any.
> 
> Even if, I'd call relying on them "broken design", esp. if considering
> that ksh had been closed source until not too far ago.

If someone has a package that has ksh scripts, I don't think requiring
that they rewrite them to bash scripts is a reasonable packaging
requirement, considering that ksh is part of fedora-core now.

The details of ksh *are* different. The fact that bash is at least as
capable, if not more so is not really relevant. 

Regards,
						Owen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/attachments/20050830/cda317aa/attachment.bin