rpms/opencdk/devel opencdk.spec,1.2,1.3

[Michael Schwendt]

On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:02:58 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:

> > 'uqm-content'
> >    (release not touched, so common package is shared for all dists)
> 
> Hmmm, for me, this one should not escape the renaming just for that reason,
> especially since there have been no FC3 packages from fedora.us, Fedora
> Extras should IMHO introduce only new clean packages (not to mention that
> two different released builds should never share the same N-E-V-R since
> there are no guarantees that they will be identical, especially when coming
> from two different build systems), and eventually keep it as-is from there
> on for future Core releases as you want to do now.

Raw data packages (e.g. containing 100 MiB of .ogg music files) will be
identical, provided that there are no important changes in RPM. Whether
and when to bump the release was also a decision as when Ville would
update uqm anyway.
 
> > The other packages with 0.fdr.1.1 (or so) were last built for FC1 and
> need
> > investigation and are tracked since FC2Status page, when they failed to
> > build for FC2. The FC3Status page contains a copy of the old FC2Status
> > page.
> 
> So the proper fix would be to remove them from the built pre-Extras, then?
> And either remove their devel branch or "blacklist" them so that they don't
> get rebuilt until someone actually decides to fix them up...

Disabling build in %prep (e.g. as done in openbox) would work.