rpms/ecl/F-13 ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch, NONE, 1.1 ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 ecl.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.8, 1.9 ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch, 1.1, NONE ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch, 1.1, NONE
Jerry James
jjames at fedoraproject.org
Tue Mar 9 16:37:34 UTC 2010
- Previous message: rpms/libldb/EL-5 generate-ldb-tarball.sh, NONE, 1.1 libldb.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message: rpms/ecl/devel ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch, NONE, 1.1 ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 ecl.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.8, 1.9 ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch, 1.1, NONE ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch, 1.1, NONE
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Author: jjames
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecl/F-13
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14060/F-13
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ecl.spec sources
Added Files:
ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch
Removed Files:
ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch
Log Message:
* Tue Mar 9 2010 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> - 10.3.1-1
- New release 10.3.1
ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch:
c/ffi.d | 2 +-
configure | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--- NEW FILE ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch ---
--- src/c/ffi.d.orig 2010-03-05 07:00:36.000000000 -0700
+++ src/c/ffi.d 2010-03-09 09:22:09.411073031 -0700
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#include <ecl/ecl.h>
#include <ecl/internal.h>
#ifdef HAVE_LIBFFI
-# include <ffi/ffi.h>
+# include <ffi.h>
#endif
static const cl_object ecl_foreign_type_table[] = {
--- src/configure.orig 2010-03-09 09:21:00.484055524 -0700
+++ src/configure 2010-03-09 09:22:09.417071020 -0700
@@ -9775,8 +9775,8 @@
if test $has_ffi_lib = yes; then
if test "${ac_cv_header_ffi_ffi_h+set}" = set; then
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for ffi/ffi.h" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking for ffi/ffi.h... " >&6; }
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for ffi.h" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking for ffi.h... " >&6; }
if test "${ac_cv_header_ffi_ffi_h+set}" = set; then
$as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
fi
@@ -9784,8 +9784,8 @@
$as_echo "$ac_cv_header_ffi_ffi_h" >&6; }
else
# Is the header compilable?
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking ffi/ffi.h usability" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking ffi/ffi.h usability... " >&6; }
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking ffi.h usability" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking ffi.h usability... " >&6; }
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* confdefs.h. */
_ACEOF
@@ -9793,7 +9793,7 @@
cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* end confdefs.h. */
$ac_includes_default
-#include <ffi/ffi.h>
+#include <ffi.h>
_ACEOF
rm -f conftest.$ac_objext
if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"
@@ -9826,15 +9826,15 @@
$as_echo "$ac_header_compiler" >&6; }
# Is the header present?
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking ffi/ffi.h presence" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking ffi/ffi.h presence... " >&6; }
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking ffi.h presence" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking ffi.h presence... " >&6; }
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* confdefs.h. */
_ACEOF
cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* end confdefs.h. */
-#include <ffi/ffi.h>
+#include <ffi.h>
_ACEOF
if { (ac_try="$ac_cpp conftest.$ac_ext"
case "(($ac_try" in
@@ -9868,30 +9868,30 @@
# So? What about this header?
case $ac_header_compiler:$ac_header_preproc:$ac_c_preproc_warn_flag in
yes:no: )
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: proceeding with the compiler's result" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: proceeding with the compiler's result" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: proceeding with the compiler's result" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: proceeding with the compiler's result" >&2;}
ac_header_preproc=yes
;;
no:yes:* )
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: present but cannot be compiled" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: present but cannot be compiled" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: see the Autoconf documentation" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: see the Autoconf documentation" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: section \"Present But Cannot Be Compiled\"" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: section \"Present But Cannot Be Compiled\"" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;}
- { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence" >&5
-$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi/ffi.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: present but cannot be compiled" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: present but cannot be compiled" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: see the Autoconf documentation" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: see the Autoconf documentation" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: section \"Present But Cannot Be Compiled\"" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: section \"Present But Cannot Be Compiled\"" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result" >&2;}
+ { $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: WARNING: ffi.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence" >&5
+$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: ffi.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence" >&2;}
;;
esac
-{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for ffi/ffi.h" >&5
-$as_echo_n "checking for ffi/ffi.h... " >&6; }
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for ffi.h" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking for ffi.h... " >&6; }
if test "${ac_cv_header_ffi_ffi_h+set}" = set; then
$as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
else
ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch:
configure | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- NEW FILE ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch ---
--- src/configure.orig 2010-03-05 07:00:37.000000000 -0700
+++ src/configure 2010-03-09 09:21:00.484055524 -0700
@@ -5824,18 +5824,13 @@
cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
/* end confdefs.h. */
-#ifdef HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H
+#include <stdlib.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
int main() {
sem_t aux;
if (sem_init(&aux, 0, 0))
exit(1);
exit(0);
-#else
-int main() {
- exit(1);
-}
-#endif
}
_ACEOF
rm -f conftest$ac_exeext
Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecl/F-13/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- .cvsignore 24 Feb 2010 20:45:14 -0000 1.8
+++ .cvsignore 9 Mar 2010 16:37:34 -0000 1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ecl-10.2.1.tgz
+ecl-10.3.1.tgz
Index: ecl.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecl/F-13/ecl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.17 -r1.18
--- ecl.spec 24 Feb 2010 20:45:15 -0000 1.17
+++ ecl.spec 9 Mar 2010 16:37:34 -0000 1.18
@@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
Name: ecl
-Version: 10.2.1
+Version: 10.3.1
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Embeddable Common-Lisp
Group: Development/Languages
License: LGPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and Public Domain
URL: http://ecls.sourceforge.net/
-Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ecls/ecls/10.2/ecl-%{version}.tgz
-# This patch has not yet been sent upstream. It fixes a malformed test for
-# sem_init() that causes the test to fail spuriously.
-Patch0: ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch
+Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ecls/ecls/10.3/ecl-%{version}.tgz
+# This patch was sent upstream on 9 Mar 2010. (Actually, the equivalent patch
+# to src/aclocal.m4 was sent upstream; this patch is to src/configure.) The
+# patch fixes a malformed test for sem_init() that causes the test to fail
+# spuriously.
+Patch0: ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch
# This patch has not yet been sent upstream. The code assumes that all libffi
# headers are in a directory named "ffi". On Fedora, they are not.
-Patch1: ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch
+Patch1: ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: libX11-devel
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
@@ -102,6 +104,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 9 2010 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> - 10.3.1-1
+- New release 10.3.1
+
* Wed Feb 24 2010 Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> - 10.2.1-1
- New release 10.2.1
Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ecl/F-13/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- sources 24 Feb 2010 20:45:15 -0000 1.8
+++ sources 9 Mar 2010 16:37:34 -0000 1.9
@@ -1 +1 @@
-e0a75273bf1dd0ef4d64d1e455353ab6 ecl-10.2.1.tgz
+baa63c920e7936452c03d1ffe1fc63c1 ecl-10.3.1.tgz
--- ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch DELETED ---
--- ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch DELETED ---
- Previous message: rpms/libldb/EL-5 generate-ldb-tarball.sh, NONE, 1.1 libldb.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message: rpms/ecl/devel ecl-10.3.1-ffi.patch, NONE, 1.1 ecl-10.3.1-semaphore.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.8, 1.9 ecl.spec, 1.17, 1.18 sources, 1.8, 1.9 ecl-10.2.1-ffi.patch, 1.1, NONE ecl-10.2.1-semaphore.patch, 1.1, NONE
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the scm-commits
mailing list