[yum/f16] added patch for yum silence

Ján ONDREJ ondrejj at fedoraproject.org
Sat Dec 10 05:29:51 UTC 2011


On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:30:26PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 21:09 +0100, Ján ONDREJ wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:55:13PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:00 +0000, Ján ONDREJ wrote:
> > > > commit 26b9deb1cca9a7eee7d86839a8d2e9c701d8938b
> > > > Author: Jan ONDREJ (SAL) <ondrejj(at)salstar.sk>
> > > > Date:   Fri Dec 9 20:00:04 2011 +0100
> > > [...]
> > > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> > > > index b4d901e..2981154 100644
> > > > --- a/.gitignore
> > > > +++ b/.gitignore
> > > > @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ yum-3.2.28.tar.gz
> > > >  /yum-3.4.1.tar.gz
> > > >  /yum-3.4.2.tar.gz
> > > >  /yum-3.4.3.tar.gz
> > > > +/yum-silence.patch
> > > > diff --git a/sources b/sources
> > > > index c5d16f2..2adb575 100644
> > > > --- a/sources
> > > > +++ b/sources
> > > > @@ -1 +1,2 @@
> > > >  7c8ea8beba5b4e7fe0c215e4ebaa26ed  yum-3.4.3.tar.gz
> > > > +0b9555f6ed3e67e247ed092dbceaf1c7  yum-silence.patch
> > > 
> > >  Ok, so a couple of questions:
> > > 
> > > 1. Why did you decide to add this?
> > 
> > See yum.spec changelog:
> > 
> > * Fri Dec 09 2011 Ján ONDREJ (SAL) <ondrejj(at)salstar.sk> - 3.4.3-7
> > - change loglevel from INFO to INFO_2, bz#750859
> > 
> > and it's bugzilla bug.
> 
>  I am aware of the bug, but that wasn't the question. I meant why _this_
> bug ... what makes it so important that it had to be backported without
> talking to any of the maintainers?

Why do you think that there was no talk with maintainers? See BZ#750859,
which was mentioned in spec changelog.
This patch has been downloaded from bugzilla, present 3 week for
maintainers, absolutelly no response in bug from maintainers,
just messages from users.

This bug has 3 duplicates. 11 emails in cc list, so many users are affected.

I am getting about 10 emails/day from yum-cron and no have free time to
delete them daily. Fedora 14 will be EOL soon, so I need to update more
machines to Fedora 16 and will get more email/day. Here is history of this
bug:

2011-11-02 11:28:52 EDT  -  37 days ago  -  bug reported
2011-11-18 05:59:55 EST  -  21 days ago  -  patch available
2011-11-30 00:27:35 EST  -  9 days ago   -  ping, help please request
2011-12-09 14:21:15 EST  -               -  my build

More than one month without response. Is this maintainer still active?

>  Are you going to do more F16 backports for upstream bugfixes? How many?
> For which bugs?

Just these which disturbs me. No more on my list now.

>  I assume you are planning on pushing them to stable, eventually ... so
> how many updates do you think users want? etc. etc.
> 
> > > 2. Why did you add the patch to the ignore list?
> > 
> > I don't. It was added by fedpkg upload.
> > 
> > > 3. Why did you add the patch to the sources list?
> > 
> > Same, ask fedpkg upload. :)
> 
>  Because that's not the way patches are normally added to a package.
> Which I assumed you knew.

No. Why there is an fedpkg upload? How I need to add new files for koji
build? It's better to use fedpkg import on an srpm?
What's difference?

			SAL


More information about the scm-commits mailing list