[weighttp: 3/6] New package based on the review feedback
Mathieu Bridon
bochecha at fedoraproject.org
Fri Oct 19 04:12:09 UTC 2012
commit e76a77636238e908d68193b0ba2d46aa3d5d1793
Author: Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org>
Date: Mon Oct 15 16:10:18 2012 +0800
New package based on the review feedback
This package was submitted on Mon Oct 15 2012:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985#c6
weighttp.spec | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/weighttp.spec b/weighttp.spec
index e9dac35..08c6ec7 100644
--- a/weighttp.spec
+++ b/weighttp.spec
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ License: MIT
URL: http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/weighttp/
Version: 0.3
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
# Upstream doesn't release tarballs, so I created this one:
# $ git clone git://git.lighttpd.net/weighttp && cd weighttp
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ provide.
%build
export CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
+# The bundled waf script seems to be 1.5.9, and the wscript was written for
+# this version. It doesn't work any more with the waf version packaged in
+# Fedora, as it is much more recent and the waf API changed since then.
+# Using the Fedora waf package would require significant changes to the
+# upstream wscript, so we use the bundled one for now.
./waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix}
./waf build %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -58,5 +63,9 @@ export CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
%changelog
+* Mon Oct 15 2012 Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org> - 0.3-2
+- Added a comment to explain why we use the bundled waf, based on Eduardo's
+ review feedback.
+
* Mon Oct 08 2012 Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org> - 0.3-1
- Initial package for Fedora.
More information about the scm-commits
mailing list