Making Fedora more secure, a 90-day goal.

[Eric Christensen]

On Monday, April 06, 2015 03:27:03 PM David Cafaro wrote:
> Another questions.  What is the ultimate goal of this ticket push?  Are
> we trying to get patches and updates no matter what or are we going to
> settle for somethings going to the orphaned queue?

Well, this might be a good way to see how many packages in Fedora are actually 
supported.  It would be great if this was just a reminder to those package 
maintainers that something is pending for one of their packages.  I suspect 
we'll end up with more non-responsive packagers before it's all over with.  
This will either mean the package gets pulled or someone else will step up to 
maintain the package.

> Would prefer to have everything get a patch and update then go to orphan
> queue myself, but that's more work.

Yeah, that's a lot more work.  Probably a better outcome but...  I don't know.

-- Eric

--------------------------------------------------
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Red Hat, Inc - Product Security

sparks at redhat.com - sparks at fedoraproject.org
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
--------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/security-team/attachments/20150406/9e260291/attachment.sig>