pam_abl selinux problem

[Daniel J Walsh]

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 novembre 2005 à 04:33 +0100, Alexander Dalloz a écrit :
>
>   
>> What I would like to know - besides resolving the ticketed problem - is
>> whether such kind of packages from Fedora Extras will have to carry
>> policy modifications / adds themselves or whether approved FE packages
>> should come up with Core policy package adjustments.
>>     
>
> My understanding in the FC core policy can be updated on request when
> the need is clear. Also, pam_abl has been suggested as a future core
> component and was not rejected, but put on the backburner, which
> suggests some period of testing in extras is wished by Red Hat. This
> testing won't happen if the package is blocked by default selinux
> policy.
>
> However it's up to Daniel and the Red Hat selinux team to decide this.
>
> Regards,
>   
I have added policy to allow for this in tonights rawhide.  
selinux-policy-targeted-1.27.2-16
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list


--