MCS article
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Fri Jan 20 16:24:20 UTC 2006
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> When I mentioned that the NFSv4 named attributes might not be suitable
> for our purposes to the Trusted Solaris folks, they said that they
> should be and that any lack there is one of the Linux implementation,
> not the protocol definition or its intended implementation.
This thread contains some discussion on the issue:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg02336.html
IIRC, the consensus on the issue is to look at adding new OPs for
Linux/BSD extended attributes.
- James
--
James Morris <jmorris at namei.org>
More information about the selinux
mailing list