selinux-policy.spec wierdness?

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Wed, 10 May 2006 10:53:16 +0300, Maxim Britov said:
> On Tue, 09 May 2006 18:07:01 -0400
>  Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> 
> > Am looking at selinux-policy-2.2.38-1.src.rpm.  Does anybody know
> > why there isn't a %build section in the .SPEC file?  I was *hoping*
> > to do a 'rpmbuild -bc' to assist in debugging an outstanding problem
> > I'm having with strict policy, but apparently all the building gets
> > done in the %install. Blech.
> 
> Confirm. selinux-policy-strict-2.2.38-1 in fc5 updates is broken :(
> 
>   Updating  : selinux-policy-strict        ####################### [ 4/10]
> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: authlogin: Duplicate declaration in module: typ
e/attribute system_chkpwd_t
> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed
> semodule:  Failed!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188060

is already open for the system_chkpwd_t problem.  I came across the specfile
problem while trying to debug that problem.

The interesting part is that Horst opened that bug against 2.2.29, I finally
got fed up with rpm complaining and found the bugzilla - and nobody else has
attached themselves to the cc: list. For a while, I was wondering if Horst and
I were the only two trying to use the Rawhide 'strict' policy...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/selinux/attachments/20060510/d26c1953/attachment.bin