Sendmail milters in Fedora 8

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Wed Jan 16 11:46:56 UTC 2008


Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Paul Howarth wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:53:18 -0500
>> Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Since upgrading my mail server from Fedora 7 to Fedora 8,
>>>>>>>>>>> I've come across some problems with the sockets used for
>>>>>>>>>>> communication between
>>>>>>>>>>> sendmail and two of the "milter" plugins I'm using with it,
>>>>>>>>>>> namely milter-regex and spamass-milter. It's very likely
>>>>>>>>>>> that other milters
>>>>>>>>>>> will have similar issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The sockets used are created when the milter starts, as
>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> milter-regex:
>>>>>>>>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex/sock (var_spool_t, inherited from
>>>>>>>>>>> parent directory)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> spamass-milter:
>>>>>>>>>>> /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock
>>>>>>>>>>> (spamd_var_run_t, in policy)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> These are pretty well the upstream locations, though I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> open to moving the milter-regex socket from /var/spool
>>>>>>>>>>> to /var/run or elsewhere for consistency.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Since moving to Fedora 8, I've had to add the following to
>>>>>>>>>>> local policy to get these milters working:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> allow sendmail_t spamd_var_run_t:dir { search getattr };
>>>>>>>>>>> allow sendmail_t spamd_var_run_t:sock_file { getattr write };
>>>>>>>>>>> allow sendmail_t var_spool_t:sock_file { getattr write };
>>>>>>>>>>> allow sendmail_t initrc_t:unix_stream_socket { read write
>>>>>>>>>>> connectto };
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The last of these is the strangest, and relates to Bug
>>>>>>>>>>> #425958
>>>>>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425958). Whilst
>>>>>>>>>>> the socket file itself has the context listed above, the
>>>>>>>>>>> unix domain socket that sendmail connects to is still
>>>>>>>>>>> initrc_t, as can be seen from the output of "netstat -lpZ":
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     14142
>>>>>>>>>>> 5853/spamass-milter system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>>> /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock
>>>>>>>>>>> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     13794
>>>>>>>>>>> 5779/milter-regex   system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>>>>>>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex/sock
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, my questions are:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Why are the sockets still initrc_t?
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is this a kernel issue or a userspace issue that should be
>>>>>>>>>>> fixed in
>>>>>>>>>>> the milters?
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Should there be a standard place for milter sockets to
>>>>>>>>>>> live, and if
>>>>>>>>>>> so, where?
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. How come this worked OK in Fedora 7 and previous releases?
>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the source code for these applications, I see that
>>>>>>>>>> both of
>>>>>>>>>> them use the smfi_setconn() function in the sendmail milter
>>>>>>>>>> library to
>>>>>>>>>> set up the sockets. It's therefore likely that this problem is
>>>>>>>>>> common to
>>>>>>>>>> all milter applications that use unix domain sockets.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm now of the opinion that moving the directory locations
>>>>>>>>>> for these sockets is a bad idea - it would need corresponding
>>>>>>>>>> changes in people's
>>>>>>>>>> sendmail configuration files, which would lead to problems for
>>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>> doing package updates, or installing from upstream sources.
>>>>>>>>>> Setting different context types for the directories (e.g. make
>>>>>>>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex spamd_var_run_t) would seem a better
>>>>>>>>>> option, along with policy tweaks to allow sendmail to do the
>>>>>>>>>> permissions checks
>>>>>>>>>> and write to the sockets).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm still confused about the initrc_t sockets though.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Paul.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>>>>>>>>> Ok I will add this to the next update.
>>>>>>>> What exactly is "this"? The 4 "allow" rules mentioned above, the
>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>> type change for /var/spool/milter-regex mentioned later, both?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Context change for /var/spool/milter-regex to spamd_var_run_t. 
>>>>>>> sendmail
>>>>>>> can already use sockets in this directory.
>>>>>> So that includes the:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> allow sendmail_t initrc_t:unix_stream_socket { read write
>>>>>> connectto }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Paul.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nope.  I don't know what is running as initrc_t and I would bet
>>>>> this is a leaked file descriptor.  Or at least a redirectiron of
>>>>> stdin/stdout.
>>>> I don't think it's a leaked file descriptor - that would be
>>>> dontaudit-able, right? By not allowing communications with the
>>>> initrc_t:unix_stream_socket, the milter fails to work:
>>>>
>>>> ==> /var/log/audit/audit.log <==
>>>> type=AVC msg=audit(1200408212.783:142453): avc:  denied
>>>> { connectto } for  pid=7805 comm="sendmail"
>>>> path="/var/spool/milter-regex/sock"
>>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:sendmail_t:s0
>>>> tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket
>>>> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1200408212.783:142453): arch=40000003
>>>> syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=3 a1=bfd9f600 a2=b7f79bd4 a3=0
>>>> items=0 ppid=7764 pid=7805 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0
>>>> egid=51 sgid=51 fsgid=51 tty=(none) comm="sendmail"
>>>> exe="/usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail"
>>>> subj=system_u:system_r:sendmail_t:s0 key=(null)
>>>>
>>>> ==> /var/log/maillog <==
>>>> Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: NOQUEUE: connect from
>>>> ard120.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.26.189.120]
>>>> Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: AUTH: available
>>>> mech=CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5, allowed mech=CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 LOGIN
>>>> PLAIN Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: m0FEhW21007805:
>>>> Milter (milter-regex): error connecting to filter: Permission denied
>>>> Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: m0FEhW21007805: Milter
>>>> (milter-regex): to error state
>>>> Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: m0FEhW21007805: Milter:
>>>> initialization failed, temp failing commands
>>>> Jan 15 14:43:32 goalkeeper sendmail[7805]: m0FEhW21007805: SMTP MAIL
>>>> command (<pathrusim at zombanewmedia.com>) from
>>>> ard120.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.26.189.120] tempfailed (due to
>>>> previous checks)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The initrc_t type shows up in netstat but not in ls:
>>>> # netstat -aZp | grep initrc
>>>> tcp        0      0 goalkeeper.intra.:bacula-fd *:*     LISTEN     
>>>> 5864/bacula-fd      system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> udp        0      0 rbldns.intra.cit:domain     *:*                
>>>> 5885/rbldnsd        system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     14142
>>>> 5853/spamass-milter system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock
>>>> unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     13794
>>>> 5779/milter-regex   system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex/sock
>>>> unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    2150436
>>>> 5779/milter-regex   system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    14141
>>>> 5853/spamass-milter system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0
>>>> # ls -lZ /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock
>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex/sock
>>>> srwxr-xr-x  sa-milt sa-milt system_u:object_r:spamd_var_run_t:s0
>>>> /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock
>>>> srw-------  mregex  mregex  system_u:object_r:spamd_var_run_t:s0
>>>> /var/spool/milter-regex/sock
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Ok then I guess we need to label
>>>
>>> chcon -t spamd_exec_t /usr/sbin/spamass-milter
>>>
>>> And then build policy off of that.
>> Whilst that might result in a solution for spamass-milter, it's not
>> going to help milter-regex or potentially any other milter (they're all
>> likely to use the same libmilter [sendmail] API for setting up the
>> sockets).
>>
>> There seems to be something odd about sockets in general; the netstat
>> output quoted above shows a couple of network-listening sockets with
>> type initrc_t too, from a further two non-milter programs, namely
>> bacula and rbldnsd. I also see the same issue with nasd and rpc.quotad.
>> though I can also see a bunch of listening sockets with
>> system_u:system_r:unconfined_t on my desktop.
>>
>> Why might some of these apps transition to unconfined_t and others not?
>>
>> And why does "ls" show a different type than "netstat"?
>>
>> Paul.
> ls is showing file context and netstat is showing processes.
> 
> Processes running as unconfined_t were started by unconfined_t without
> going through an initrc_exec_t type.  So either you started these
> processes directly or the label of their start up script is wrong
> 
> ls -lZ /etc/init.d/*
 >
> restorecon -R -v /etc/init.d
> 
> Should fix.

I suspect that the stuff running in unconfined_t gets started as part of 
  a Gnome session rather than via an initscript.

> So we need to allow sendmail to read sockets setup by initrc_t?

Is it true to say (I think it is) that any process started via an 
initscript that doesn't transition to another domain (e.g. stuff that 
nobody has written policy for yet) will be in initrc_t?

If so, the following is currently needed.

> Adding
> init_stream_connect_script(mailserver_delivery)
> init_rw_script_stream_sockets(mailserver_delivery)
> 
> 
> Will allow all programs that deliver mail to read/write/connectto
> initrc_t unix_stream_sockets.

This looks right for now, though I'm tempted to hack together policy for 
my two milters at least. What I was thinking of was creating a 
milter_template along the lines of the apache_content_template that 
could be used as a starting point for milter applications (all of which 
will communicate with sendmail [and postfix too for that metter] in the 
same way), and then add on anything necessary for each individual milter 
(some of which would require nothing else, some would require database 
connectivity etc.).

Paul.




More information about the selinux mailing list