init_script_type versus init_script_file

[David Carter]

This doesn't solve my problem of building on FC9 though...

On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Carter wrote:
>> Good morning.
>>
>> I'm trying to build a module package but I'm running into issues with
>> these macros. When I build in my FC9 development environment, I  
>> require
>> init_script_file. When I use mock, it will only build using
>> init_script_type. Why the difference, and what do I do about it?
>>
>> While I might expect issues across versions, I don't expect a  
>> difference
>> when my mock target and my build environment are the same.
>>
>> Also, if FC10 is different from FC9, how do I handle that?
>>
>> TIA
>> - Dave
>>
>> -- 
>> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
>> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> init_script_file is what you should use.  That is what upstream wants.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkkGEZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNadgCgl2r7MXSlnl6JDSGjkGmAOF9d
> qaIAoKWgRaDHkiGBuKphhPrpD53FBp6A
> =QyPf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>