unconfined domains and Dan Walsh's article

[Klaus Lichtenwalder]

Am 04.04.2011 20:12, schrieb Daniel J Walsh:
> On 04/02/2011 03:52 PM, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote:
>> I've been reading Dan's article about undefining the unconfined domain
>> ("10 things you probably did not know about SELinux.. #4"). Curious as
>> I'm often am, I tried it. And hit bugzilla 627879... Are there any plans
>> to [continue/start] work on this?
> 
>> Klaus
> 
> 
> 
>> --
>> selinux mailing list
>> selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
> According to this bug report, 627879 is already fixed?
> 
> 

Dan,

it does not show up in normal operation. It just showed up when I
undefined all unconfined domains, as per your post, for tests. For
normal operations this bug is fixed, I was more or less following on
your plans to move along with a more stricter targeted policy...

Klaus

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Klaus Lichtenwalder, Dipl. Inform.,  http://www.lichtenwalder.name
 PGP Key fingerprint: BF52 72FA 1F5A 1E29 C0F8  498C C4C6 633C 2821 97DA

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/selinux/attachments/20110404/d3214460/attachment.bin