AWStats Update-now link has permissions issues

Dmitry Makovey dmitry at athabascau.ca
Thu Nov 1 21:27:23 UTC 2012


On October 30, 2012 16:14:10 Dmitry Makovey wrote:
> > > Which really raises a question: should base policies (and modules)
> > > cover
> > > all aspects of "normal"/"legitimate" functionality of applications
> > > "out-of-the- box" or shall we expect it to cover only a subset? Is it
> > > SELinux's group role to suggest "insecure" practices that will not be
> > > covered by policies and probably should be discouraged irregardless of
> > > SELinux state (on or off)?
> > 
> > 
> > In my view ideally it should be transparent but in practice  SELinux is
> > also used to block "functionality" sometimes
> > 
> > A boolean for the above should be fine in my view
> 
> 
> should I drop request in RH bugzilla? 

For continuity, and FYI:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872345

-- 
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245
---
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
    Woody Allen

When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout 
     http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330


-- 
    This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it
    is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged
    information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
    recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take
    action relying on it. Any communications received in error, or
    subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
---


More information about the selinux mailing list