Common groups for web data

[Leam Hall]

Good point. Making it a feature in F13 should carry things well, and a 
short name like "www" would be best.

Not sure what yo umean about helping folks with the upgrade.

Leam

Doug Warner wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I often see problems like in bug#507406 [1] because I run lighttpd on some
> servers.  Like the report says, having a separate group for web servers like
> 'www' or 'www-data' like debian does would go a long way for commonly
> installed packages.
> 
> How do others feel about this?  Should we shoot for a feature for F13?  What
> kind of problems are we going to run into with changing the group in all the
> web packages?  What can we do to help people with the upgrade?
> 
> - -Doug
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507406
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFKsOCEJV36su0A0xIRAn5dAJ9xJjvunlhLCbMh5D+eRUEpQ5bM2wCfVIpb
> CApk4HvzEaTBx0D49R0aFJo=
> =i4Kq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-server-list mailing list
> fedora-server-list at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-server-list
>