Common groups for web data
leam at reuel.net
Wed Sep 16 23:06:04 UTC 2009
Good point. Making it a feature in F13 should carry things well, and a
short name like "www" would be best.
Not sure what yo umean about helping folks with the upgrade.
Doug Warner wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> I often see problems like in bug#507406  because I run lighttpd on some
> servers. Like the report says, having a separate group for web servers like
> 'www' or 'www-data' like debian does would go a long way for commonly
> installed packages.
> How do others feel about this? Should we shoot for a feature for F13? What
> kind of problems are we going to run into with changing the group in all the
> web packages? What can we do to help people with the upgrade?
> - -Doug
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507406
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> fedora-server-list mailing list
> fedora-server-list at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the server