Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/01/2013 02:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 14:30:38 -0400, Stephen Gallagher
> <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> So yes, that sounds ambitious, but what do you think of the
>> idea?
> 
> Is Fedora Server going to have its own package repository? If not
> it looks like there will be conflict with people who want to
> update packages in Fedora between releases that we wouldn't want to
> update for the server product.

Yes, the same way that Fedora 19 and Fedora 20 have different
repositories. It's nothing new.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJz+A4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6MtLACZATaSABDJZxW3rTX3PO7FBzFH
5kEAn2SEECF5Z2IWLwB4ry8k7vWEq/eE
=hSGB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----