Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/04/2013 05:58 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> 
> On 11/04/2013 10:48 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> In my experience the NFS server works just fine in Fedora,
> 
> Interesting...
> 
>> that said I do not understand your statement, if we decide to
>> make NFS server a primary use case we'd coordinate closely with
>> the maintainer to make sure it doesn't break, no ?
> 
> Yes but the maintainer himself has to be willing to accept our
> changes and last time I spent 6 hours getting the nfs spec files up
> to speed and Steve just dismissed those changes and implemented
> something that goes even against our guidelines instead so out of
> the 500+ components including the file server related components
> from my stand point nfs would be our last pick not first.
> 

That's unfortunate, but if this is an issue going forward, I will try
to address it from the Red Hat side. That being said, let's try to
keep this discussion (for now) on "what we want to see" and hold "what
we will actually do" until later. Remember that our goal here is not
to define Fedora 21 alone. We really want to be setting the tone for
the future of Fedora Server. If that means setting lofty goals that
take several releases to hit... that's why I suggested the preview and
stable servers.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJ4Mx4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6PAIACdGPrerBOmES52w7NUH1/pT4AX
V68AoKESUYHxsYU3t17S89Zm6bp+p4Ta
=N7up
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----