Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml at conversis.de
Tue Nov 5 11:35:02 UTC 2013


On 05.11.2013 00:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/04/2013 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:43:53 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 11/04/2013 10:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>> This seem squarely in the cloud WG realm, right ?
>>>
>>> Hosting the cloud server falls under us coming up with the vm's
>>> cloud images falls under the cloud SIG We handle the servers they
>>> handle the images.
>>
>> That was my thought was well... we should make sure the cloud
>> folks have the same understanding. ;)
>>
>
> I've had much the same conversation with Matthew as well. We seem to
> be on the same page that it's certainly within the realm of the Fedora
> Server to provide the hypervisor/container provider side of a cloud
> infrastructure while they focus on the worker instances.

If the cloud WG limits itself to the guest end of things shouldn't it 
really be called "cloud guest WG"? cloud WG sounds like it deals with 
*everything* concerning cloud deployments.

Regards,
   Dennis



More information about the server mailing list