Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 11/05/2013 12:42 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/05/2013 07:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 11:43 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2013 11:35 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>>
>>>> If the cloud WG limits itself to the guest end of things
>>>> shouldn't it really be called "cloud guest WG"? cloud WG sounds
>>>> like it deals with *everything* concerning cloud deployments.
>>> The hosting and running the cloud itself is an server role if not
>>> we wind up having to split the server WG into thousand parts...
>>>
>> I do not totally agree with this view. A cloud host is a very
>> specialized minimal install that normally just needs the hypervisor
>> and an agent to run VMs, and pretty much nothing else. I do not see
>> it as a general use case for the Server WG that should rather deal
>> with fully functional machines.
>>
> There's certainly a discussion to be had around where things like
> oVirt nodes would belong. I'm CCing Matthew Miller to get his
> attention here so we can start talking about this between the two
> groups (I'm not sure if he is constantly reading our mailing list).

If you think that this split is not accurate

Cloud WG handles
Client
Images
SaaS

Server WG handles
Paas
IaaS
( NaaS )

then I suggest we dissemble the server WG  and come up with more server 
application spesific targeted WG

JBG