Server Admins: Why not Fedora?

Simo Sorce simo at redhat.com
Wed Nov 6 15:00:00 UTC 2013


On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 09:56 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 05:18 AM, David Strauss wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Container support is one of the topics that the Environments/Stacks
> >> people are being tasked with investigating. The other thing is the
> >> option for *limited* bundling of dependencies with something like
> >> Software Collections.
> > I'm frustrated with how poorly these working group tasks were defined
> > before and during working group formation. Why are we finding out only
> > now what each group is supposed to do? I was clear in my
> > self-nomination that containerization is a key priority for me.
> 
> Containerization falls under us as well to a certain extent as in we 
> need to ensure that server applications can be installed and operated in 
> a self container or an OS container and this will requires to rework our 
> entire units as well as drop /etc/sysconfig environmental stuff ( finally )

I do not understand your last point, where do you put the 'stuff' that
is now in /etc/sysconfig ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York



More information about the server mailing list