Server Admins: Why not Fedora?

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 11/06/2013 03:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> +1 to fedora moves too fast, I've only had incidents with breaking
>>> desktop apps occasionally.
>> This is something I'm curious about: Is the "moves to fast" problem
>> widespread throughout the distribution, or specific to some parts
>> (e.g. the GUI)?  Are the "core servers" (httpd, samba, NFS, cups, mail
>> infrastructure and the like) also moving to fast, for example?
>  From my experience the server services generally upstream tends to be
> less cavalier in their changes to config files and from my experience
> a lot of newer releases will still work on older config files, instead
> you either don't get a feature or it operates in a default manner.
>

The only thing that I can remember on top of my head is apache 2.4 which 
did introduce slight incompatability in configuration ( which Remi 
detected and fixed I belived distro wide for it ) as well as freeradius 
2.x and now bind 10 I believe.

JBG