Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

[Máirín Duffy]

On 11/08/2013 10:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Not *exactly* (but this is pretty much exactly the graphic I was
> trying and failing to draw, so thank you for that). The "security
> fixes only" phase was going to start at N.3[1], not be from N.2 to
> N.3. The idea was for there to be an overlap period to allow stable
> deployments to migrate to N+1.

Okay what about this (you may have to shift-reload to get the new
version):
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/1/12/Serverwg-proposal-serverlifecycle-timeline.png

~m