Discussion of Fedora Server use-cases
Michael R. Davis
mrdvt92 at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 28 22:55:25 UTC 2013
>> - /etc/fstab.d/ capability
>Could you provide an example of why this might be useful? Do you
>programmatically change mount points enough for this?
I have applications that need mounts points. I need to deploy to every server. I'd like to do this in RPM easily not in chef or puppet or augtool.
>> - Moving /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo files from fedora-release to an
>> independent package that can optionally not be installed in the
>> kickstart. THIS IS A BIG SECURITY PET PEEVE OF MINE.
> Could you elaborate a bit on this one as well please?
My IT guys will do a yum update before they remove the default repo files an we'll get Internet installed RPMs on our systems. Which is a no-no for us. We are required to only use the local repo which may be behind the latest on the net but that's what's been tested with the apps.
> > We really need to fix the Oracle instant client mess.
> I've not found oracle overly willing to help in most aspects. In most
> cases they've been condescending and arrogant.
We still need to do the best we can to make it easy.
These are the RPMs that we have build. I think most are home grown but there is no need for every company to repeat this mess.
apr-util-oracle
oracle-instantclient11.2-httpd
oracle-instantclient11.2-wrapper
oracle-instantclient11.2-bashrc
oracle-instantclient11.2-ldconfig
>> Bottom line I think Fedora should provide the running building block or
>> even full running applications like TurnKey Linux with a nice default
>> configuration. e.g. I need a running webserver "yum install httpd-on".
>> I need a running database "yum install postgresql-server-on".
>Would there be an equivalent -off for folks who wish to manually tinker
>prior to enabling?
yum erase httpd-on; turns it off it's just a wrapper package...
but yum install httpd; service httpd start; would still work.
> I'm not convinced that yum should be in the business of
> enabling/disabling services like this.
"yum" would not be. The spec "post" would actually "do" it.
I think if we raise the bar we can start building mansions and the end application only need to build a room. If we raise the bar far enough there's no stopping us.
Thanks,
Mike
mrdvt92
More information about the server
mailing list