The "Membership" section of the governance charter draft

Máirín Duffy duffy at redhat.com
Thu Oct 31 22:49:27 UTC 2013


On 10/31/2013 06:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> So, to give an alternative proposal: "Active participant in the server
> WG" would be sufficiently targeted for me, simple enough (... and
> equally unenforceable).

+1 That seems fair to me. I think you'd have to have the experience to
have the interest to actively participate anyway :)

~m



More information about the server mailing list