The "Membership" section of the governance charter draft

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 18:49 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 06:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > So, to give an alternative proposal: "Active participant in the server
> > WG" would be sufficiently targeted for me, simple enough (... and
> > equally unenforceable).
> 
> +1 That seems fair to me. I think you'd have to have the experience to
> have the interest to actively participate anyway :)

+1 let's not burden ourselves too much with rules, when we'll see the
need we'll add them in due course.

Simo. 

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York