Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Apr 24 17:09:54 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/23/2014 09:35 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Hi! As it seems, Fedora.Next and product planning leads also to
> changes how Fedora is produced and how it's going to be distributed
> to our users.
> 
> For this, we need to collect product deliverables, so needed
> changes for release engineering can be planned (and implemented)
> and as I was talking to Dennis, we're are currently blocked on it.
> 
> 
> I created rel-eng ticket - WGs, please, try to sum up required
> changes there (in consumable way), so we have it in one place (for
> possible overlaps in requirements etc).
> 
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5891
> 


Before we submit this to the rel-eng ticket, we should come to a
consensus on exactly what we plan to ship in F21.

- From the Technical Specification[1]:


Fedora Server will run on and provide install media for i686, x86_64,
and armv7hl servers.

There will be two official install media for the Fedora Server:

* A network installation media (either a traditional netinst.iso or a
boot.fedoraproject.org style)
* A local installation media providing the default package set as well
as any featured roles that are meaningfully installed without a
network connection.
  * The local installation media will be allowed a maximum size to fit
on a 4.0GB USB device.
  * The local installation media can be pointed at network resources
to make available a larger package set.


We previously deferred the plans on what type of network-install media
we would support. I think it's probably time to bring that back up
now. The local installation media should be pretty straightforward.

- From previous discussions with Dennis Gilmore (CCed) it sounds to me
that our ISO-creation tools will build a network-install tree as a
side-effect, so if I understand correctly, we should be able to use
the classic netinst.iso or virt-install simply pointed at the Fedora
Server install tree as well. If this is the case, I'd suggest that we
should probably ship a netinst.iso that points at the Fedora Server tree.


> Currently, Alpha Change Deadline is planned for no earlier than 
> 2014-07-22, it's not as far as it sounds, especially if changes in
> releng are needed. So let's try to work this out as soon as 
> possible.
> 
> I suppose, in the end, FESCo should approve requested changes in 
> product deliverables. So once requirements are collected, I'll 
> create (yet another) ticket for FESCo. Or even better - as Cloud 
> did - Change proposal would be the best solution, even after the 
> submission deadline.
> 

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification#Supported_Architectures_and_Install_Media
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNZRWIACgkQeiVVYja6o6P2awCfaz+5bsAhPqNWb0he1nDHdyFp
SJAAnRIXy1A+V+Cy86gwWt1owlyRpEzh
=jeEF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the server mailing list