Soliciting agenda items for 2014-04-28 meeting

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at
Mon Apr 28 15:10:43 UTC 2014

Hash: SHA1

On 04/28/2014 11:05 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> <sgallagh at <mailto:sgallagh at>> wrote:
> On 04/28/2014 10:42 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher 
>> <sgallagh at <mailto:sgallagh at>
> <mailto:sgallagh at <mailto:sgallagh at>>> wrote:
>> This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure
>> back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner
>> (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role
>> API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like
>> to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on
>> exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this
>> to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other
>> important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan
>> accordingly.
>> Thank you very much. 
>> _______________________________________________ server mailing 
>> list server at
> <mailto:server at>
>> <mailto:server at
> <mailto:server at>>
>> I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and 
>> document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on 
>> the list.  Can this be added to the agenda and discussed,
>> please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a
>> commitment.
> This is certainly a useful idea to suggest to the documentation
> team. I don't know that there's much to discuss about it on the
> meeting, unless someone wants to suggest that this is not a good
> idea.
> I don't think we want to be "supporting" any kickstarts, though. 
> Examples are good, but I don't think shipping pre-built kickstarts 
> will be sensible or useful (given that most deployments need to 
> customize anyway). _______________________________________________ 
> server mailing list server at
> <mailto:server at> 
> Consider this a suggestion *from* the documentation team. Having 
> examples and some documentation on adjusting them was the idea.  I 
> thought it would be prudent to keep the working group in the
> discussion, instead of writing the documentation independently :)

Ah, gotcha. Yes, we will likely generate a few example kickstarts as
part of testing this functionality. We should probably make sure that
the QA and Docs folks are sharing these between them.
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -


More information about the server mailing list