default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Tim Ski]

Does Red Hat provide support for Fedora? If not then in my opinion btrfs
would be a great use case for Fedora to push upstream to RHEL.  With XFS
defaulting in RHEL 7 that's cool so I think we should be ahead of the curve
not an Ubuntu competitor or a glorified RHEL release.  Like I said in my
opinion.
On Feb 26, 2014 1:08 PM, "Rahul Sundaram" <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> No, that isn't true.  Without wide adoption you may not have any
>> impetus for btrfs to get better.  However, it getting better is
>> dependent upon wider development, maintenance, and testing.  I'm not
>> sure we are in a position to actually do that, and that is the bulk of
>> my hesitation.  Throwing something upon Fedora users as a default with
>> the hopes that it will improve is pretty horrible in my opinion,
>> particularly if we aren't able to actually fix things they find.
>>
>
> Does Fedora or more specifically Red Hat have anyone working on Btrfs
> upstream that can help guide the path forward?  It can't be possibly be the
> right decision to let Btrfs be struck in the current position for too long.
>
> Rahul
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/attachments/20140226/88ac409b/attachment.html>