Call for votes: Server Technical Specification

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:55:34 -0500
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:

...snip...

> What we need right now is a vote of the Server Working Group
> membership whether we feel this document is in sufficiently good shape
> to send to FESCo, who intends to use it to gauge estimates for the
> Fedora 21 schedule. Please cast your votes as soon as possible (I
> realize this may mean giving up an hour of your weekend to read the
> document). If you have serious concerns, please raise them
> immediately. 

In general I am +1 to sending to fesco. ;) 

Some minor nits: 

* I think we should drop the note about armv8... it not only needs
  hardware available, but promotion from secondary arch, etc. I'd love
  to support it, but I don't think we should try and do so before it's
  been fully brought up.

* I don't know that there are any tech limitations for /boot not on
  lvm. But there's still an important case that needs it: encrypted /

* Did we want to list the media? ie, a network install iso and a non
  network install iso and sizes?

Looks great otherwise, although I am sure we need to flesh it out some
and add things we havent thought of yet. ;) 

Thanks for writing things up!

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/attachments/20140228/fd0a8a04/attachment.sig>