Fedora Server and Docker

Colin Walters walters at verbum.org
Tue Jun 3 12:55:29 UTC 2014


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014, at 12:43 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:

> The 2 roles we have in Fedora Server for now are FreeIPA and Database
> server. The 'meat' for both of them is in the data they provide, so I
> see little value in trying to use containers for them. 

I'd say again there are a collection of factors here, and then agree
with
you that those factors do weigh in favor of traditional deployment.

> Although I can
> totally see how we may want to containerize them as an option in F22 as
> a way to upgrade the host but keep running the old code.

Yes, though that raises the question about the support lifecycle of
the dependencies.  If you're talking about shipping F21 FreeIPA
and rebasing the host to F22 (or equivalent for downstreams),
I would say that sort of thing is potentially a major win for
both the upstream and the downstream.

We could without changes in the upstream (Fedora in this case)
lifecycle allow running F21 containers on F22, as the component RPMs
are supported for N and N-1.

In practice with Fedora today though, the kernel for example is already
rebased
in lockstep between N and N-1 and has been for some time - encouraging
old apps on new host would just be a more flexible version of the
current
reality.


More information about the server mailing list