"Problem reporting" section of tech spec rather loose
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Jun 12 14:46:34 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/09/2014 10:33 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:31:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> the word "must" appears multiple other times in the page, so we
>>> have the old chestnut of whether we're using "must" and
>>> "should" with strict definitions, or as synonyms, or what.
>> I think we MUST clean the MUST and SHOULD's up there.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt
>
>
Yes, these are the definitions by which we MUST operate.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlOZvUoACgkQeiVVYja6o6N1CQCfYmN/gA+hXManmJJVN7WBzApw
nIsAniIUIq1oDaO6Inm9YoAP5scJKnjK
=CMXA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the server
mailing list