Release criteria draft revised again

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:54 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> > Sorry for sounding harsh, I was just a bit frustrated. So, let me try
> > again: if you have concerns about our ability to implement the Server
> > tech specs within the current F21 timeframe, well, that's a thing. The
> > Server WG actually has similar concerns, which is why it asked FESCo for
> > a schedule modification recently, but that's not exactly how it came
> > out.
> >
> >
> My concerns in relationship to your document was if
> 
> Role deployment
> Role service query
> Role firewall configuration
> Role functional requirements
> 
> were overly or underly ambitious for what could be met. I did not
> communicate that well and I can understand the frustration as negative
> nancies steal the life out of everything.

Aside from the last, they all come direct from the tech spec. The last
seems rather implied; a role that doesn't actually work isn't much use
to anyone. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net