Release criteria draft revised again
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Jun 26 21:43:52 UTC 2014
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 15:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I've revised the release criteria draft again, with reference to the
> useful discussions both on-list and at this morning's meeting:
> I added the firewall exception for the Cockpit web interface, clarified
> the issue about role deployment "at install time", and added new
> criteria for the cockpit management interface to be running OOTB and for
> roles to meet their "functional requirements, as defined in their role
> specification documents" - role specification documents being something
> I invented out of my ass at the meeting this morning. View that one as a
> trial balloon. :)
> As always, thoughts / comments welcome!
Today I've added a Server-specific variant of the 'post-install boot'
requirements criterion from the 'generic' Alpha criteria:
it basically trims out the stuff that doesn't apply to Server.
I'm still thinking about exactly how to present the Product-specific and
generic criteria for F21 as a whole, but for now I'm including all
things that differ at all from the 'generic' criteria on the
Product-specific draft pages I'm working on (I've just started working
on the Workstation criteria).
I also added a criterion requiring user creation to work in scripted
it seems natural to me to include requirements relating to scripted
installation as part of the Server criteria, though they could *perhaps*
go into the generic criteria instead...but it seems like Server is by
far the most likely use case for them. We kind of need a whole set of
kickstart criteria, but we've always kind of punted on creating them, as
it's a big area to try and define...but now might be the time.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the server